Rubric

Find Rubric
LCA Final Project Rubric
LCA Final Project Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Goal & Scope Communication
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Identifies the goal of the LCA with the scope elements with supporting details organized logically and coherently.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Identifies the goal of the LCA with some supporting scope details in an organized manner.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Identifies the goal of the LCA with a few scope details in somewhat organized manner.
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
Identifies the goal of the LCA poorly with few or no scope details.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Misidentifies or fails to identify the goal and the scope.
pts
50 pts
--
Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Uses accurate calculations, data, or reasoning to estimate inputs and outputs to the different stages of the LCA. Identifies facts and relevant info correctly.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Uses logical calculations, data, or reasoning to estimate inputs and outputs to the different stages of the LCA. Identifies facts and relevant info correctly.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Uses superficial estimates, data, or reasoning to estimate inputs and outputs to the different stages of the LCA. Shows some confusion regarding calculations, data, or info.
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
Makes unexplained, unsupported, or unreasonable estimates, to estimate inputs and outputs to the different stages of the LCA; makes multiple errors in calculations or in selecting relevant data and info.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Does not provide LCI elements.
pts
50 pts
--
Life Cycle Inventory Assessment (LCIA)
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Insightfully relates LCI results with impact categories; distinguishes appropriate category indicators and characterization models.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Accurately relates LCI results with impact categories; correctly identifies category indicators and characterization models.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Inaccurately or incompletely relates LCI results with impact categories; shallow determination of category indicators and characterization models.
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
Poorly relates LCI results with impact categories; Incorrectly determines category indicators and characterization models.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Does not identify impact categories, category indicators, and characterization models.
pts
50 pts
--
Interpretation
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Insightfully interprets LCI and LCIA; identifies obvious as well as hidden assumptions, establishes credibility of sources, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support, compares to others’ and evaluates them. Their study recognizes missing info; correctly identifies potential recommendations and limitations.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Accurately interprets LCI and LCIA; identifies obvious as well as hidden assumptions, establishes credibility of sources, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support, compares to others’, and evaluates them. Recognizes missing info; identifies potential recommendations and limitations.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Makes some errors in LCI and LCIA interpretation; makes arguments using weak evidence; provides superficial support for conclusions or recommendations; shallow comparisons to other’s results.
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
Interprets LCI and LCIA incorrectly. Supports conclusions or recommendations without evidence or logic; uses data, info or evidence skewed by invalid assumptions; uses poor sources of info; uses fallacious arguments; Identifies some assumptions; does not consider other’s results.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Does not evaluate LCI or LCIA info nor provides recommendations.
pts
50 pts
--
Written Report
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Polished and professionally written. Outstanding organization, labelling of visuals (charts, graphs, etc.) and use of headings/subheadings makes it easy to scan for specific information; all phases of the LCA are present.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Clearly Organized and well written report; all phases of the LCA are present.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Contains some organizational inconsistencies and occasional language errors; some phases of the LCA are missing or developed superficially
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
Poorly organized and contains frequent language issues; sections of the LCA are missing or poorly developed.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Confusing organization and language; No report is submitted
pts
50 pts
--
Project Presentation
threshold: pts
50 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Team masterfully provides the class with highlights of their study.
40 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Team provides the class with highlights of their study.
30 to >20.0 pts
Developing
Team provides the class with some LCA nuggets of their study.
20 to >10.0 pts
Emerging
LCA presentation is poorly delivered.
10 to >0 pts
Not Present
Does not present the result of the assessment.
pts
50 pts
--
Total Points: 300 out of 300