Rubric

Find Rubric
Assignment 7
Assignment 7
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content
threshold: pts
10 pts
Exemplary
Presents content accurately. All info is organized logically and coherently. Graphics and layout are highly effective.
7 pts
Proficient
Presents content in an accurate and somewhat organized manner. Graphics and layout are appropriate.
5 pts
Developing
Presents content accurately. Some required info is missing and/or not presented in a logical order but can still be followed. Most images are appropriate.
3 pts
Emerging
Content is questionable. Info is disorganized and hard to follow. Layout is cluttered.
1 pts
Not Present
Content is thin and/or inaccurate. No images
pts
10 pts
--
Analysis
threshold: pts
10 pts
Exemplary
Uses specific inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences; addresses implications and consequences; identifies facts and relevant info correctly.
7 pts
Proficient
Uses logical reasoning to make inferences; addresses implications and consequences; Identifies facts and relevant info correctly
5 pts
Developing
Uses superficial reasoning to make inferences; Shows some confusion regarding facts and relevant, evidence, data, or info.
3 pts
Emerging
Makes unexplained, unsupported, or unreasonable inferences; makes multiple errors with fact or in selecting relevant evidence.
1 pts
Not Present
Fails to provide any meaningful analysis.
pts
10 pts
--
Evaluation
threshold: pts
10 pts
Exemplary
Insightfully interprets data/info; identifies obvious as well as hidden assumptions, establishes credibility of sources on point other than authority alone, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support.
7 pts
Proficient
Accurately interprets data/info; identifies obvious assumptions, establishes credibility of sources on points other than authority alone, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support.
5 pts
Developing
Makes some errors in data/info interpretation; makes arguments using weak evidence; provides superficial support for conclusions or recommendations.
3 pts
Emerging
Interprets data/info incorrectly. Supports conclusions or recommendations without evidence or logic; uses data, info or evidence skewed by invalid assumptions; uses poor sources of info; uses fallacious arguments.
1 pts
Not Present
Does not evaluate data, info or evidence related to recommendation.
pts
10 pts
--
Synthesis
threshold: pts
10 pts
Exemplary
Insightfully relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; uses new info to enhance recommendations; recognizes missing info; correctly identifies potential effects of recommendation.
7 pts
Proficient
Accurately relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; uses new info to enhance chosen solution; correctly identifies potential effects of recommendation.
5 pts
Developing
Inaccurately or incompletely relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; shallow determination of effect of recommendation.
3 pts
Emerging
Poorly integrates info from more than one source to support chosen solution; Incorrectly predicts the effect of new info on recommendation.
1 pts
Not Present
Does not identify new info for recommendation.
pts
10 pts
--
Overall Presentation
threshold: pts
10 pts
Exemplary
Provides a polished and well-rehearsed performance. Makes use of humor, attention grabbers, questions, polls, and other methods to interact and engage with the viewer.
7 pts
Proficient
Provides a clear, effective, and coordinated performance.
5 pts
Developing
Shows evidence of limited coordination and rehearsal.
3 pts
Emerging
Shows little to no evidence of coordination or rehearsal.
1 pts
Not Present
Provides a chaotic and confusing performance.
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 50 out of 50