20to >10.0 pts
Full Marksdemonstrating learning using a learning curve (in the writeup). For full credit, make sure you explain why it is learning or not learning (if it isn't learning, you will not lose your points if you can explain WHY it is not learning)_9969
10to >0.0 pts
Learning not demonstratedand no analysis of why it isn't learning_8605
0to >0 pts
No Marks_8889
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
20 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriteup: learning description_8058
20to >15.0 pts
Full Markscorrectly implemented the RL method that you proposed and got feedback on (if you were told to choose a different method, you need to implement the method you were told to adjust to). A correct learner uses learning in a way to improve performance and learning will be demonstrated in the writeup (though the curve is graded separately) using a learning curve. Learning code should be well documented to receive full credit.blank
15to >10.0 pts
minor mistakes79345_9115
10to >5.0 pts
documentation missing or several mistakes79345_7653
5to >0.0 pts
major errors79345_3557
0to >0 pts
No Marksblank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
20 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRL state space79345_8334
20to >10.0 pts
Full Markscorrectly implementing a second RL task or integrating a learning method from project 5 into project 6 and documenting with a learning curve and paragraph describing it in the writeup79349_7303
10to >0.0 pts
missing learning curve79349_4774
0to >0 pts
No Marks79349_1585
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
20 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion