Course Syllabus

Contact Information

This table includes information about how to contact your instructor and other important details about your class

Image of 'anonymous' person

Office Hours:  by appointment

Email: garn@ou.edu

Live Session: Weeks 1, 3, 4, and 5

Zoom link

Zoom Meeting ID: 950 9907 5301

Zoom Passcode: 11060210

 

Dr. Gregg Garn

Jeannine C. Rainbolt College of Education

Course Details

For a list of course activities, scroll to the bottom of this page.

Course Delivery

This is a multi-modal course. Much of your learning will take place online and asynchronously within Canvas. You will also have synchronous learning opportunities with the instructor and your peers during the weekly Live Sessions via Zoom. 

Course Prerequisites 

Graduate standing

Course Materials

All course materials will be provided on the "Resources" page of each course module.

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO) 

  1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the science of school leadership as defined by visionary, instructional, organizational, collaborative, ethical, and contextual leadership.
  2. Demonstrate competencies required to lead continuous improvement of school organizations.
  3. Demonstrate relevant content knowledge and skills required for those associated with building level administration.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLO) Alignment

Course Learning Outcomes
CLO Description PLO
A Synthesize knowledge of the American educational system, including its federal, state, local, and tribal components. 1, 2, 3
B Critique political and social claims in course readings and relate them to practical experiences. 1, 2, 3
C Outline how schools contribute to citizenship in a democracy through concrete activities. 1, 2, 3
D Enhance leadership skills by modeling effective communication, using research for policy improvement, and applying knowledge to improve educational outcomes. 1, 2, 3
E Assess the history and expansion of public education and understand how schools are governed. 1, 2, 3
F Describe contemporary issues in education policy, reform, and accountability. 1, 2, 3

Grades

Breakdown

Course activities and grades listed for each activity
Activity Description Points/Percentage
Concept Checks (x8)
  • 10-question quiz for selected module topics
15%
Discussion (x5)
  • Discussion prompts on respective module topics
25%
Live Session Participation (x4)
  • Thoughtful participation in our Live Sessions
10%
Policy Memo (x2)
  • Brief written document identifying the problem for consideration, indicating a recommendation for action, and providing supporting evidence
  • Before submitting your assignment, you will be required to submit your paper to Tutor.com for review and feedback
30%
Final Reflection
  • Written essay reflection spanning the entire course
20%
Total  100%

Scale

Grade Scale
Percentage Letter Grade
90–100% A
80–89% B
70–79% C
60–69% D
Below 60% F

Course Components

Concept Checks

The concept checks are intended to ensure that students have the foundational knowledge and/or component skills needed to fully participate in the upcoming Live Session, where they will be asked to apply or extend their learning. This auto-graded quiz holds students accountable for the reading and video lectures. It will serve as a formative assessment to check students’ gist understanding and comprehension of key concepts. Each quiz item will be related to a module learning outcome.

Discussion Boards

Discussion Boards provide an open/free/safe space for low-pressure exchange of ideas, similar to an in-person classroom conversation. Students will integrate new knowledge with existing knowledge and apply that knowledge to a prompt/scenario. Students form and communicate an educated stance on the topic/case at hand. Some posts will also encourage/require analysis & synthesis and use of professional writing with supporting evidence.

For each week with assigned readings, you must write a brief reflection guided by the instructor's discussion prompts. These reflections should be structured and thoughtful, avoiding a disorganized list of ideas or mere summaries of the readings. In addition to your initial post, you must also write a brief response to at least one classmate's post.

Policy Memo

This assignment aims to take an important issue at the local, state, or federal level and develop a brief overview for a decision-maker. The audience might be your principal or superintendent, a board member, or a state or federal policymaker. It is helpful to have links to relevant documents and details, but keeping it consumable for a busy leader with limited knowledge of the topic is more important.  

Policy memos are designed to give the reader the background by clearly identifying the problem or issues for consideration, indicating a recommendation for action, and providing supporting evidence. Advocates and policy think tanks often have these brief documents in hand as an aid to educate legislators and other elected officials. 

Final Reflection

Reflection is an important part of learning through experience. By reflecting on our experiences, we acknowledge the work we've achieved and the progress we've made, as well as maximize the potential for new learning and understanding.


Course Policies

Generative AI*

In this course, I encourage you to use artificial intelligence (AI) - powered applications and programs such as CoPilot or ChatGPT. These programs can help you with some assignments. When using these tools, it is your responsibility as a scholar to ensure you are clearly communicating the AI involvement in your work.

Remember, generative AI is highly beneficial, but it does come with certain limitations:

  1. Opaque Processes: The internal mechanisms that generate specific outputs are not transparent, making it difficult to understand how a particular result is produced.

  2. Data Dependency and Bias: Outputs are derived from pre-existing data, often sourced from the internet, which can introduce biases. These outputs might also be inaccurate or entirely fabricated, despite appearing credible.

  3. Intellectual Property Issues: There are significant concerns regarding the sourcing and ownership of information. The status of AI-generated content raises numerous questions, such as whether it should be treated like a published resource and what citation responsibilities apply.

The following sections outline the philosophy and specific guidelines for using these tools and features. As generative AI becomes more integrated into everyday applications, these guidelines should be followed unless otherwise directed for a specific assignment or exam.

Usage Philosophy

The use of generative AI in your coursework is guided by the following principles:

  1. AI as a Thinking Aid: AI should assist you in thinking, not think for you. Use these tools to generate ideas, conduct research (in line with point 2 below), and analyze problems. Do not use them to complete your work for you, such as entering an assignment question into ChatGPT and copying the response as your answer.

  2. Responsible and Ethical Engagement: Engage with AI technologies responsibly by critically evaluating AI-generated outputs and considering potential biases, limitations, and ethical implications in your analysis and discussions. Use AI technologies ethically, respecting privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property rights. Ensure that data used for AI applications is obtained and shared responsibly and in compliance with relevant regulations.

  3. Accountability for Final Product: You are fully responsible for your final product. If the AI makes a mistake and you use it, it becomes your mistake. If you are unsure about the accuracy of any statement in the output, it is your responsibility to research it. If you cannot verify it as factual, you should remove it. You are accountable for AI-generated content as if you had created the materials yourself, ensuring ideas are attributed, facts are accurate, and sources are verified.

  4. Transparency and Documentation: The use of AI must be transparent and documented. These guidelines apply unless specific instructions are provided for an assignment or exam. It is your responsibility to ensure you are following the correct guidelines.

  5. Confidentiality of Data: Do not enter confidential or personal data into generative AI tools. Entering such data (e.g., your One Card details) into these tools can expose you and others to the risk of losing important information. Therefore, avoid doing so.

  6. Citing AI: Use phrases such as "This paper was generated with the help of GPT-4" (for essays) or "[your name] via CoPilot" (for images).

Remember to review the instructions in each assignment for more specific details on how to incorporate AI in your work.

*CoPilot was used in the development of these guidelines – more specifically, it was employed to rephrase and consolidate certain sections of text sourced from University Policies on Generative AI.

Communication 

If you have any general questions about assignments, class logistics, due dates, etc., please post a question in the Course Help Board in the Start Here Module. You can post questions about the course to the Course Help Board throughout the semester. Your classmates may be able to answer your questions.

For any other questions, students should use their OU e-mail or Canvas to communicate with the instructor. They can expect a response usually within 24 hours Monday-Friday. Professional communication is an expectation.

Feedback 

I will do my best to enter grades and provide feedback in Canvas within a week of the assignment’s submission date. 

Late Policy

Students are expected to adhere to all assignment deadlines as outlined in the course syllabus and are encouraged to proactively manage their time and workload to minimize the likelihood of missed deadlines. In the event of unforeseen circumstances that may prevent meeting a deadline, students should promptly communicate with the instructor as soon as possible, providing a clear explanation of the situation. Early communication allows for a potential extension to be discussed and arranged.  

Plagiarism 

Plagiarism is the most common form of academic misconduct at OU. There is no college-level assignment that can be satisfactorily completed by copying. OU's basic assumption about writing is that all written assignments show the student's own understanding in the student's own words. That means all writing assignments, in class or out, are assumed to be composed entirely of words generated (not simply found) by the student, except where words written by someone else are specifically marked as such with proper citation. Including other people's words in your paper is helpful when you do it honestly and correctly. When you don't, it's plagiarism. 

For more information about plagiarism, watch the OU Libraries Plagiarism Tutorial video and take the short Avoiding Plagiarism Tutorial Canvas course offered by University Libraries.


University Academic Policies and Student Support

Access the University Academic Policies Document.

Course Summary:

Course Summary
Date Details Due